Adaptec and DMA (long)
Norman Kohn
nvk at ddsw1.MCS.COM
Tue Nov 6 11:15:07 AEST 1990
In article <9 at kaspar.UUCP> ires at kaspar.UUCP (Bruce R. Larson) writes:
>In article <1990Nov02.021739.9280 at ddsw1.MCS.COM>, nvk at ddsw1.MCS.COM (Norman Kohn) writes:
>> There have been many comments about boards that won't support
>> the Adaptec 1542[AB] SCSI bus master controller.
>i) With all of the boards removed except the 1542B and a monochrone
> video adapter, the monitor frequently refused to display anything
> until the reset button was pressed a number of times.
>ii) whether the monitor would work at all was influenced by the relative
> positions of the video card and the host adapter. In most config-
> urations it just did not work.
>iii) The system would not even go through its memory test when the
> serial/parallel card was present. (No, there weren't any IRQ
> or base i/o address conflicts.)
>
>These sound like timing problems to me.
>
>THE SOLUTION
>I remembered a posting in this group (thanks again guys) about
>possible problem when using the 1542B. I replaced the 1542B with
>a 1542A and every problem vanished. I discovered this last night,
I spoke with the technical person at the vendor who'd told me this.
He says that it's a characteristic of boards using the C&T chipset.
The 1542B holds the bus too long during its ROM boot-up.
Later buson/busoff are configurable in software (e.g., under ISC unix).
This is allegedly a matter of optimistic timing programmed into the
on-board ROM and could be solved with a ROM upgrade (fix).
Karl Deninger may be right that the motherboard could/should speak
up for itself. I called Adaptec but have not heard back from
their technical people yet.
--
Norman Kohn | ...ddsw1!nvk
Chicago, Il. | days/ans svc: (312) 650-6840
| eves: (312) 373-0564
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list