SCO's V.4 plans <was: ^3 What ....... Dell UNIX V.4>

[Vic Rice]

shwake at raysnec.UUCP (Ray Shwake) writes:

>richard at pegasus.com (Richard Foulk) writes:

>>SCO has, so far, promised NOT to go with V.4 -- buzzing about in their own
>>separate reality.

>	As I recall from an SCO presentation at our user group last December,
>their stated inclination is to enhance 3.2 with those components or features
>from V.4 most in demand. Considering the notable increase in resource

Wouldn't the pending release of OSF/1 have some impact on SCO's willingness
to work V.4 ?
-- 
Dr. Victor L. Rice
Litwin Process Automation