Dirty Rotten DMA problem (?) Simultaneous tape & diskette use
Colonel Panic
aland at informix.com
Sat Nov 17 11:52:32 AEST 1990
In article <1990Nov11.205350.108 at eslvcr.wimsey.bc.ca> ted at eslvcr.wimsey.bc.ca (Ted Powell) writes:
>In article <1990Nov7.155748.12583 at oct1.UUCP> mason at oct1.UUCP (David Mason) writes:
>>>[...bad things happening when using both tape and floppy...]
>
>The AT&T 386 Unix does have the DMAEXCL parameter. Before I turned it
>off, I tried installing Fastback Plus on the DOS partition of the disk.
>The installation procedure includes a check for this DMA problem. My
>chip passed the test, so then I turned off DMAEXCL, which is ON by
>default.
The funny thing is... the AT&T doc states that "some machines' DMA
controllers may not be able to handle simultaneous DMA...", but
AT&T Support has never been able to give me a definitive answer as
to whether or not *their own machines* can handle it... (they use
discrete logic rather than a major name DMA controller chip, so it's
not likely to be something I can find out from anyone else...)
>Seems to me the best thing for the Colonel to do (he didn't mention
>having tried it already) is to turn DMAEXCL back on and see whether this
>makes the problem go away. If it does, then it's chip replacement time.
The problem doesn't "go away", per se... I get Double Kernel Panics
if I *don't* set DMAEXCL to 0. That's how I discovered the parm in
the first place.
>ted at eslvcr.wimsey.bc.ca ...!ubc-cs!van-bc!eslvcr!ted (Ted Powell)
--
Alan Denney aland at informix.com {pyramid|uunet}!infmx!aland
"I went to Wall Street with the desire to help change society for the
better, not to find a fortune."
- Michael Milken
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list