Unix & X-Windows on 386SX

[Bob Palowoda]

>From article <2318 at tabbs.UUCP>, by aris at tabbs.UUCP (Aris Stathakis):
> In <156 at raysnec.UUCP> shwake at raysnec.UUCP (Ray Shwake) writes:
> 
>>palowoda at fiver (Bob Palowoda) writes:
> 
>>> Anyways it is a sad day when
>>>buyers are willing to pay more to take a feature out of product. C2 is
>>>not part of UNIX. It's part of the goverment. I like ISC idea you buy
>>>it in a different package. What's wrong with that. 
> 
> What's wrong with that is that it isn't C2.  The C2 standard states that
> it must be included in the product, and you cannot have the same product
> without the C2 security - or else it does not constitute C2.

  What is the rationale behind this?

---Bob

-- 
Bob Palowoda   palowoda at fiver              |   *Home of Fiver BBS*
Home {sun}!ys2!fiver!palowoda              | 415-623-8809 1200/2400
     {pacbell}!indetech!fiver!palowoda     |     An XBBS System                
Work {sun,pyramid,decwrl}!megatest!palowoda| 415-623-8806 1200/2400/19.2k TB+