ESIX and MCA

[John C. Archambeau]

cpcahil at virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) writes:
>In article <5485 at crash.cts.com> jca at pnet01.cts.com (John C. Archambeau) writes:
>>I'm getting ready to put together a Unix System V/386 System and I need to
>>make the decision of whether or not to go ISA or MCA with respect to the
>>system bus.  The only problem I'm faced if going the MCA route is if ESIX
>>supports MCA.  The machine will be handling a lot of I/O and it very well
>
>You also might want to check into the EISA bus.

I will say this once.  I already know about EISA.  I already know about the
potential problems with EISA.  To put it bluntly...

I DON'T WANT EISA!

After EISA has become more established, then I will consider going EISA,l but
not until then.  What scares me about the EISA bus is that there are still a
LOT of quirks with EISA machines.  HP's 486 with EISA bus will ONLY work with
HP's EISA cards.  I don't want to be a lab rat.  MCA has proven itself to me,
and I want a proven design for this machine.

So instead of sending me a bunch of junk about looking into EISA, how about
some kind soul sending me information on ESIX and MCA.

Yes, I am annoyed because of the fact I don't take kindly to people telling
what *I* want when I know what I want.  You're not me.  I know what this 386
will be doing which is why I want MCA as opposed to ISA or EISA.

It's bad enough that I get this from vendors and distributors, but on the net
as well?
 
     // JCA

 /*
 **--------------------------------------------------------------------------*
 ** Flames  : /dev/null                     | Small memory model only for
 ** ARPANET : crash!pnet01!jca at nosc.mil     | Unix?  Get the (*bleep*) out
 ** INTERNET: jca at pnet01.cts.com            | of here!
 ** UUCP    : {nosc ucsd hplabs!hd-sdd}!crash!pnet01!jca
 **--------------------------------------------------------------------------*
 */