OS costs

[Greg Pavlov]

In article <hart.653741863 at blackjack>, hart at blackjack.dt.navy.mil (Michael Hart) writes:
> (quoting previous article) 
> >The BSD license is about as cheap and un-restrictive as they come; it's the
> >next best thing to PD.  Where possible, they've released pieces of code that 
> >aren't subject to AT&T license; in any case, you get the code with little
> >more than a charge for media/copying, etc..........

  but but but BSD told me that I needed the AT&T source license FIRST before
  getting the BSD license.  And the former is NOT cheap, unless you are an 
  officially-sanctioned "Educational Institution".

  (UNIX, after all, is a proprietary operating system....)

  greg pavlov, fstrf, amherst, ny