14 character limitation in filenames
Conor P. Cahill
cpcahil at virtech.uucp
Sat Feb 2 10:11:25 AEST 1991
In article <1991Feb1.003532.15719 at NCoast.ORG> allbery at ncoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR) writes:
>"Silliness"? I still fail to understand why everyone wants to be able to
>create files with humongous names --- I don't enjoy typing 14 character file
>names (but don't want to decrease that size, there *is* a tradeoff here), the
>30-plus-character names I've seen in use on some BSD systems don't appeal at
>all.
I don't like humongous names either, but 14 is a bit too short. Especially
when you consider that two are lost for the typical source file extension
and another two are lost for the source code control system (either SCCS
or RCS) - thereby leaving only 10 characters for the file name. This I have
found to be a little too short sometimes, but like anything else
you can live with it.
--
Conor P. Cahill (703)430-9247 Virtual Technologies, Inc.
uunet!virtech!cpcahil 46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160
Sterling, VA 22170
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list