Help with SCO X11R4 and TCPCONN ?

[Rindress MacDonald]

   Hi,
      Has anybody tried compiling Jim Kelly's SCO patches with TCPCONN
   instead of STREAMSCONN?  I am having no luck in getting this to
   work, maybe someone can give me some advice on why I get this
   message when I execute xinit.

...{stuff deleted}
XIO:  fatal IO error 90 (Operation would block) on X server ""
      after 0 requests (0 known processed) with 0 events remaining.

   The only thing I can think of is that EWOULDBLOCK is not
   defined properly, but I'am not quite sure what he ment about
   "When you compile with sco and TCPCONN you must leave
   EWOULDBLOCK alone because that is what SCO sockets will return."
   Any help will be greatly appreciated.  Thanks in advance.


					Thanks,
					Rindress

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
			 Name: Rindress MacDonald
		Email address: macdonal at mips2.cr.bull.com
                 Phone number: (508)294-2797
                      Company: Bull Worldwide Information Systems
              Company address: 300 Concord Rd. Billerica MA 01821 
                    Mail Stop: MA30/826A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------