sysv386 vs. ILC/SLC???
Paul Emerson
paul at sdgsun.uucp
Wed Feb 6 02:58:52 AEST 1991
>From article <1991Feb4.132518.18331 at arrayb.uucp>, by warner at arrayb.uucp (Dave Warner):
> I would like to pose a question for discussion, i.e.:
>
> Why would anyone buy a NEW 33 MHz '486 PC to run
> UNIX(tm) vs. buying an ILC or SLC from Sun??? Or,
> for that matter, an S4000 from Solbourne???
>
Well I've worked with Sun's for the past 5 years and like them
very much. I even considered purchasing one for my home system.
The problem does come down to cost and it's not purchase cost of
the actual hardware. It's maintenance cost and software cost. At
work we have a Sun maintenance agreement, which has saved us
thousands of dollars. But it is something I can't afford for a
home system. We have Sun 3 stuff and have replaced every monitor
at least twice some even 4 times in the last 5 years. The mono
monitor is about $1900.00. If something breaks on a PC class
machine the cost of replacement can be much cheaper depending upon
your equipment. You also have more choice of equipment, a mono PC
monitor will do in a pinch if your VGA eats it, and so on.
Software is another issue. The Sun OS is quite cheap $400.00
(less docs I believe ), but other software is expensive.
Of course this whole argument is based on the purchase of a home
system. If you work for a big fat corporation go for a Sun and
get a maintenance agreement. Sun's hardware service has been
great. I don't bother to call the software guys, it's usually a
waste of my time.
With all that said I am looking at a Sun 3/50 which is now cheap
enough (~$800) to hack into a X terminal.
--
Paul J. Emerson SDG Division of SAIC
Senior Technical Manager 450 Lakemont Ave.
UUCP: uunet|tarpit!sdgsun!paul Winter Park, FL 32792
Internet: sdgsun!paul at bikini.cis.ufl.edu (407) 657-1300
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list