security bug vs. AT&T 3.2.1 (bug doesn't show up)
Mark McWiggins
mark at intek01.uucp
Fri Feb 15 06:13:47 AEST 1991
kherron at ms.uky.edu (Kenneth Herron) writes:
>weave at chopin.udel.edu (Ken Weaverling) writes:
>>># /etc/conf/bin/idtune UAREARW 0
>>This bug is also present on AT&T SYSV/386 and that tunable param ain't
>>defined on my box. I called my vendor today. They are *working* on it....
>Confirmed. The bug exists on Sysv 386 3.2.1, and there's no parameter
>by that name.
I tried it on my AT&T 3.2.1 (no coprocessor) and got a core dump. Don't
know what's different.
--
Mark McWiggins Integration Technologies, Inc. (Intek)
+1 206 455 9935 DISCLAIMER: I could be wrong ...
1400 112th Ave SE #202 Bellevue WA 98004
mark at intek.com Ask me about C++!
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list