Equinox -vs- AT&T 6386E
Norman J. Meluch
norm at cfctech.cfc.com
Thu Feb 21 01:15:11 AEST 1991
lbert359 at pallas.athenanet.com (Lee Bertagnolli) writes:
{L} This is particularly frustrating. The AT&T supplied IPC boards aren't worth
{L} a darn.
Lee. Seems that both you and I have had our troubles with AT&T.
However, with release of ver 3.0 of their IPC software, I find AT&T's boards
to be quite useful for most any "PC" serial port application that you need.
Either from UNIX (tm) or via a network application (shared modem or printer).
I wouldn't go dogging them without specific examples.
To date we run HP Laserjets (500,II, & III), share spoolers, serial to
parallel converters, modems, and Okidata printers off our IPC 802 boards
with *absolutely* no troubles.
Although abit awkward in size, the 802 board performs quite well and I am
very pleased with them. I have not had any experience with the (smaller
EPORTS-like) 900 series of the IPC boards, but rumor has been that they
perform equally well.
- Norm.
--
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Norman J. Meluch ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
| Mail: norm at cfctech.cfc.com Fax:(313)948-4975 Voice:(313)948-4809 |
| Note: The opinions expressed here are in no way to be confused with valid |
|_______ideas or corporate policy.____________________________________________|
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list