14 character limitation in filenames
Ken Seefried iii
ken at dali.gatech.edu
Wed Jan 30 08:24:41 AEST 1991
In article <290 at sps.com> arm at sps.com (Annette Myjak) writes:
>can anyone explain why there's the 14 character limitation in filenames
>(11 + 3 for extension) in interactive unix?
Cause AT&T is brain dead? Most all Version 7, System III and System V
based Unixes have a 14 character filename limit (11+3? Where'd you
get that?). Posix has also followed this silliness...
>is this common for all 386 based unices?
Yes, save Mach/386 (and OSF/1) and BSD 4.x/386.
>is this limitation likely to be overcome anytime soon?
Overcome in System V release 4. It *can* be done in System V.3.2
(Tektronix UTek V for the 88000 has flex-names and is 3.2 based).
Noone has done it for the 386 that I know of.
>enquiring minds want to know! (this limitation is making it difficult
>to port a fairly extensive software system.)
Yea...join the club...
--
ken seefried iii "A sneer, a snarl, a whip that
ken at dali.cc.gatech.edu stings...these are a few of
my favorite things..."
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list