SCO uname
Brian Chapman
chapman at sco.COM
Fri Jan 4 09:18:23 AEST 1991
jpr at jpradley.jpr.com (Jean-Pierre Radley) writes:
>Sounds good but it seems to me I already have that version. Running
>"uname -v -r" shows:
> 3.2 2
BTW all versions of SCO UNIX uname(C) report "3.2 2".
This is what the utsname contained in the original
AT+T system V 3.2 tape. And we have left it alone
for compatiblity reasons.
In 3.2v2 we have defined a scoutsname structure that
is printed out w/ uname -X.
If uname -X fails w/ an error message then you have
3.2.0 or 3.2.1.
Doing a what(C) of the binaries, as jpr points out, is
a valid test of the version.
--
Brian Chapman uunet!sco!chapman
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list