ISC 2.2 q/ TCP 1.2.0 questions/problems
Jim Deitch
jdeitch at jadpc.cts.com
Thu Jan 24 19:44:50 AEST 1991
In article <323 at stiatl.UUCP> bgi at stiatl.UUCP (Brad Isley) writes:
>larry at nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
>
>>bgi at stiatl.UUCP (Brad Isley) writes:
>
>>>I'm building smail 3.1.19 for ISC 2.2 right now. I'll keep you posted on
>>>my progress. Porting to this OS is NOT trivial.
>
>>Hmm? I have smail3 from uunet (even though it says smail3.19 is
>>is actually smail3.18) and it compiles fine (no porting required)
>>under Interactive Unix..
>
>>As a matter of fact, I've installed it on 3 different machines - without
>>the need to change a single line of code..
>
>What I was referring to was getting the Bezerkely/SYSV mixture configured.
>All the default setups work fine. If you want to use Bezerkely features
>under SYSV you have to go mangle the config stuff down in os/config. For
>the folks like us who aren't very familiar with sendmail and network jargon
>it's not trivial.
>
>Like I said, it's not trivial. But it's not really difficult, either.
>The problem was the time wasted just figuring out what had to be done to
>get it past the compiler the way you want it built. I haven't done any
>testing on what I was able to compile, but I did get SMTP support compiled.
>
>Cheers!
>--
>-----------------------------\ / ..and Apple thought GUI was theirs!.. \
> bgi at stiatl.uucp 841-4169 \---| Yer local zymurgist & Amiga hacker/user |
> OR \ Klein bottle for sale- Inquire within /
> brad at slammer.UUCP 925-9663 Brad Isley, Sales Technologies, Inc.
Hmm...All I did was to use the bsd networking choice and had no
problem. I am using ISC 2.2.0 and am more pleased than anything. I
hate a cryptic control file.
Jim
--
ARPANET: jadpc!jdeitch at nosc.mil
INTERNET: jdeitch at jadpc.cts.com
UUCP: nosc!jadpc!jdeitch
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list