many baby-size 80486 motherboards fail with ISC 2.2.1 & 1542B & HPDD
Joern Lubkoll
lumpi at dobag.in-berlin.de
Fri Jun 14 08:52:07 AEST 1991
leo at aai.com writes:
>What does this problem sound like? My guess is that it has to do
>with the High Performance Disk Driver using the 1542B in bus
>mastering mode. Does ISC do this? If so, have all these board
>manufacturers made the same mistakes? Other than this
>problem(!), the systems run fine. If you have a baby-size
>motherboard that you use with ISC 2.2.1 and a 1542B, you might
>want to try a similar test. Am I the only one to see this?
Never had any Problems with the following bioa/chipset-combinations:
80386SX, no Cache, Intel, AMI (ugly slow)
80386-20, no Cache, Chips/Technologies, AMI
80386-25, no Cache, Chips/Technologies, AMI
80386-25, Cache (Intel), Ti-Chipset, Phoenix
80386-33, Cache (Intel), Ti-Chipset, Phoenix
80386-33, Cache (TTL), Opti-Chipset, Ami
80386-33, Cache, Chips/Technologies, AMI
80486-25, Cache (TTL), Opti-Chipset, Award
I had about 50 Boards last year matching the above specifications,
every type of board ran fine with isc 2.02/2.2/2.21
No board tested worked properly with Intel SysVR4, 2.0.
jl
--
For millions of years we shared our impossible to say.
And every every day - heaven moves further and further away ...
(Anne Clark)
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list