SCO C++? Not a chance.

[Daniel Edelson]

In article <foo foo blah blah>
>In article <284E3C3B.1846 at tct.com> chip at tct.com (Chip Salzenberg) writes:
>>Why *buy* when you can *get*?

>>I have yet to see one good reason not to use GNU G++.  (We do.)

I don't claim these are reasons not to use g++, just a disadvantages:

1) documentation

2) Source code compatibility with ``current-style'' C++:

		nested types, 
		delete[], 
		cout << endl;	  /* I know: ``const char * endl = "\n";'' */

G++ is better in ways, e.g. inlining, price, source code....
I'm eagerly awaiting 2.0 ...

---
Daniel Edelson                 |  ``Recycle your garbage. Please don't
daniel at cis.ucsc.edu, or        |    make me come and copy after you.'' 
uunet!ucscc!terra!daniel       |