IDE Drives
Dave McLane
davidg%aegis.or.jp at kyoto-u.ac.jp
Wed Mar 13 08:35:06 AEST 1991
rreiner at yunexus.YorkU.CA (Richard Reiner) writes:
> lam at hyper.hyper.com (Edmund C. Lam) writes:
>
> >The drawback with IDE comes from the fact that the interface limits
> >your data transfer rates to an observed maximum of 400K/s.
> >The drive might be quick on average access time, but IDE drives
> >suffer from low transfer rates.
>
> As a generalization, this is false. I have observed 950 Kb/sec from
> IDE drives on ISA 386-33 machines.
For what it's worth, I spent some time investigating whether to use
"IDE" or "ESDI" before I got my UNIX box (Dell 333D with 320 MB
ESDI). The conclusion I came to is that one cannot make any kind
of intelligent decision based upon the names; instead you need to
know both the average seek time *and* the transfer rate.
My simple minded comparison test to concatenate a 96 K file 8 times
to make one 768 K file took the following times:
80386 SX 16 Mhz with 40 MB IDE 7.5 Mbps controller: 10 sec
80386 SX 16 Mhz with 190 MB IDE 14.8 Mbps controller: 4 sec
80386 33 33 Mhz with 320 MB ESDI 20 Mbps controller: 2 sec
Kinda makes sense if you look at the Mbps, doesn't it?
--Dave
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list