Esix verses the rest of 386-unix

Martin J. Schedlbauer martin at saturn.uucp
Sat Mar 16 23:21:18 AEST 1991


In article <294 at rancor.UUCP> bob at rancor.UUCP (Bob Willcox) writes:
>In article <1991Mar10.211104.9790 at cimcor.mn.org> mike at cimcor.mn.org (Michael Grenier) writes:
>
>Since I only use FFS, I set NBUF low (100, probably could have gone
>lower though) since I don't think they are being used.  (Does anyone
>know if the 1KB buffers are ever used if you don't have any S51K 
>filesystems?)
>

I once tried to set that value to about 30 (Esix) and then the system wouldn't
boot. It seems that during the initial boot it uses some of these buffers. I
guess there was a reason why the Esix folks set it the minumum to 100 in mtune:)

	...Martin



-- 
==============================================================================
Martin J. Schedlbauer	| martin at saturn.UUCP	| ...!ulowell!saturn!martin
8 Gilman Road		| mschedlb at ulowell.edu	| ...!uunet!wang!saturn!martin
Billerica, MA 01862 USA	| CIS: 76675, 3364	| /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\



More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386 mailing list