Esix verses the rest of 386-unix
Martin J. Schedlbauer
martin at saturn.uucp
Sat Mar 16 23:21:18 AEST 1991
In article <294 at rancor.UUCP> bob at rancor.UUCP (Bob Willcox) writes:
>In article <1991Mar10.211104.9790 at cimcor.mn.org> mike at cimcor.mn.org (Michael Grenier) writes:
>
>Since I only use FFS, I set NBUF low (100, probably could have gone
>lower though) since I don't think they are being used. (Does anyone
>know if the 1KB buffers are ever used if you don't have any S51K
>filesystems?)
>
I once tried to set that value to about 30 (Esix) and then the system wouldn't
boot. It seems that during the initial boot it uses some of these buffers. I
guess there was a reason why the Esix folks set it the minumum to 100 in mtune:)
...Martin
--
==============================================================================
Martin J. Schedlbauer | martin at saturn.UUCP | ...!ulowell!saturn!martin
8 Gilman Road | mschedlb at ulowell.edu | ...!uunet!wang!saturn!martin
Billerica, MA 01862 USA | CIS: 76675, 3364 | /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list