wanted: UNIX or clone

[Larry Snyder]

pim at cti-software.nl (Pim Zandbergen) writes:

>Some DBMS systems, although they don't play with the console,
>bypass the filesystem, which may cause incompatibilities.

>PROGRESS 4GL/RDBMS is such an example. You can't run UNIX Progress
>on XENIX or the other way around, even though the binaries will
>execute. This may also explain the need for a different version
>for SCO, since it does not use the S51K filesystem.

Interesting... We run Progress on our multiprocessor Arix box -
and I wonder if the data files would run under Progress on a
386 Unix box?

-- 
      Larry Snyder, NSTAR Public Access Unix 219-289-0287/317-251-7391
                         HST/PEP/V.32/v.32bis/v.42bis 
                        regional UUCP mapping coordinator 
               {larry at nstar.rn.com, ..!uunet!nstar.rn.com!larry}