SCO Unix 3.2v2.0 + Micropolis 1325 hard disk?
david.a.vancleef
dvc at cbnewsb.cb.att.com
Fri May 17 23:40:46 AEST 1991
In article <LIBOVE.91May1091948 at libove.det.dec.com> libove at libove.det.dec.com (Jay Vassos-Libove) writes:
>generic 386sx clone running SCO Unix v3.2v2.0
>Micropolis 1325 68(?)MB MFM hard drive
>the Micropolis disk is actually repackaged as a DEC RD53
>
>The questions become:
>Is there something different about this drive because it was
>resold by DEC as an RD53?
>Does SCO Unix v3.2v2.0 have a problem with drives that are
>not directly supported by the BIOS (though the BIOS in this
>box does have this user configurable support mode)?
>Is there something about a Micropolis 1325 disk that causes
>problems, for SCO Unix or whatever else?
I was using a similar hardware configuration, except running off of
AT&T SVR3.2.2, and encountered no problem. The system was a 386-25, AMI
bios, and the drive was also a cast-off RD53, aka 1325, running as the
second drive in the system. My suspicions would lie towards the
manufacturer/vintage of your BIOS or the SCO UNIX.
-------
David A. Van Cleef AT&T Bell Laboratories
internet: dvc at hrmso.att.com Red Hill Facility, Middletown, NJ
uucp-land: ...!att!hrmso!dvc +1 908 615 4906
More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386
mailing list