wanted: UNIX or clone

Bill Vermillion bill at bilver.uucp
Sun May 5 02:00:00 AEST 1991


In article <832 at tiamat.fsc.com> jim at tiamat.fsc.com ( IT Manager) writes:

>In article <24 at metran.UUCP>, jay at metran.UUCP (Jay Ts) writes:

>> I think it's just a case of Wordperfect not realizing how similar ISC UNIX
>> and ESIX are.  I really doubt there would be any problem that could not be
>> easily worked around.
 
>Since upgrading to SCO Unix, we've used the Xenix copy of WP that we have
>under Unix with no problems.
 
>This is the reason we stuck with SCO Unix.  I came to the conclusion that if
>any Unix 386 vendor was going to insure backward compatibility with Xenix,
>it would be SCO.  This is born out by the fact that we still build and
>execute programs using Xenix 286 libraries that were originally bought for
>Altos Xenix 286 on our SCO Unix machines.

I have had NO problems running Xenix programs under Esix.

As a matter of fact, there is an xinstall package for install Xenix
packages on ESIX.   

Here is the tail of that file.

----------
echo "\n"
echo "XENIX System V/386 $pack PACKAGE INSTALLATION COMPLETED"
echo
echo 'Now return to the installation section of "Starting XENIX."\n'

exit 0

----------

And when executing the custom file, instead of the first three options
being OS, Dev Sys, and Text processing with item 4 being "Add a supported
product", the menu just comes up with  1. Add a supported product. 

The Unix V.3.2 is supposed to run Xenix binaries, and it does.

And binaries compiled under SCO's Xenix work find too.  The surprise is
when you do a files on a Xenix file.

files on a typical Unix file is

<filename>:	iAPX 386 executable

while file on a Xenix file in the same system gives this.

<filename>:	Microsoft a.out separate pure segmented word-swapped not-stripped 386 executable

Say THAT 3 times fast.


All of the current 385 Unix release should run the binaries with no
problems.  However SCO did do a lot of work to make sure that all those
familiar with Xenix would have no problems and retain a familiarity.

I have both SCO's Xenix and Esix's Unix and have no problems running Xenix
files on Unix.   And I have no problems moving tar files between the
machines, or mounting a Xenix file system floppy on the Unix machine.
I have not tried the reverse.


-- 
Bill Vermillion - UUCP: uunet!tarpit!bilver!bill
                      : bill at bilver.UUCP



More information about the Comp.unix.sysv386 mailing list