Disk Fragmentation
Steve Loudermilk
slouder%pernod at note.nsf.gov
Tue Jan 31 06:08:24 AEST 1989
Reply-to: slouder%pernod at note.nsf.gov (Steve Loudermilk)
I am involved in a local discussion about the benefits of "compacting" the
information on our disks regularly. By compacting I mean dumping to a
different device, running "newfs" and then restoring a file system.
One school of thought says this is necessary and should be done fairly
frequently to avoid excessive fragmentation and inefficient disk I/O.
The other school of thought says it isn't necessary because of the way
the Berkeley "fast file system" (BSD 4.2) handles assignment of
blocks and fragments when a file is stored.
Our system is a Vax 11/785 with six ra81 disk drives, running Ultrix 2.3.
We are currently using a block size of 8192 and a frag size of 1024
for all file systems except one, where we have 4096/1024. All file
systems are running with at least 12% free space.
Should I worry about fragmentation? If so, is dumping and restoring
the best solution?
Thanks in advance,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Loudermilk Internet: slouder at note.nsf.gov
Integrated Microcomputer Systems Inc. Phonenet: (202) 357-9648
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Comp.unix.ultrix
mailing list