File serving among VMS/Ultrix
Eric Fielding
eric at batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu
Fri Nov 10 09:59:20 AEST 1989
In a recent article grr at cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins) wrote:
>In article <4823 at buengc.BU.EDU> bph at buengc.bu.edu (Blair P. Houghton) writes:
>> Is it possible to use a VMS system as a file server for Ultrix workstations?
>It is said that the VMS/Ultrix Connection (aka UCX) can (or will be able)
>do this. Get the latest dope from your DECperson and make sure you're
>talking about release 1.2, which may or may not be available yet...
We have been running UCX on our VAXcluster to serve a DECstation 3100 for
about a month.
>Rumor has it that there are two modes available - one where you get NFS
>access to ordinary VMS filesystems and the other where VMS/UCS maintains
>a Unix disk image inside a "container file" and serves this up.
This is right. We have been using the access to the VMS files mode so far.
>It's not clear exactly to what extent UCX supports booting Ultrix diskless
>workstations in a VMS only environment
I don't think this is presently available.
>...or how, overall, the UCX service
>compares to the usual unix flavor.
>...Works with TCP/IP protocols over ethernet, not sure how/whether DECnet
>is involved or not.
Well, it looks to me like it is pretty much standard NFS service, using TCP/IP.
DECnet is not involved at all. From the U*IX end, it looks like a U*IX
NFS disk, with the one exception being the fact that the VMS files ignore
UPPER/lowercase, just like VMS does. It is amazing that it even seems to
deal with transferring file types most of the time, though not always.
The main disadvantage I can see so far is that the NFS$SERVER process on the
VMS machine grabs a lot of physical memory (6000 pages).
++Eric
More information about the Comp.unix.ultrix
mailing list