DS5000 PXG graphic performance and X support
George Robbins
grr at cbmvax.commodore.com
Fri Jul 6 17:24:44 AEST 1990
Any of you DECstation experts out there want to talk a little about about
whether the UWS 4.0 X servers will support / make effective use of the added
accelerator hardware on the PXG display controller?
I'm trying to migrate a PC layout application where the users are accustomed to
using a relatively low resolution display, but with hardware zoom and pan, over
to a bit-mapped workstation environment. They like the speed of the DS3100 on
the compute bound phases, but hate the graphics. I feel that there's some
graphics performance point, at which their objections turn to mere grumbling.
>From the graphics performance white paper, it appears the DS5100 PX would be
2-4 times as fast at redraw, but the PXG is only $2k more and I'd pay it
gladly if it would help speed things up a bit more or provide additional
backing memory or other notable improvement.
Most of the PXG and PXG turbo discussion centers on PHIGS performance, but
I'd really like to know if X can use the added hardware or just ignores it...
On a slightly different note, what form do the 8->24 bitplane and Z-buffer
upgrades take? Is it some new module, or just adding some video simms?
--
George Robbins - now working for, uucp: {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!grr
but no way officially representing: domain: grr at cbmvax.commodore.com
Commodore, Engineering Department phone: 215-431-9349 (only by moonlite)
More information about the Comp.unix.ultrix
mailing list