What irks me about Unix mail
root%bostonu.csnet at CSNET-RELAY.ARPA
root%bostonu.csnet at CSNET-RELAY.ARPA
Mon Dec 10 00:53:39 AEST 1984
If you mean that VAX MAIL under VMS using DECNET
is more reliable in its routing it is because it
encompasses a trivial network, what do you have?
5 or 10 VMS/VAXes on a single simple spine or point-point?
Anyone can solve networking as long as they limit
the problem enough which is largely what decnet does.
When you have hundreds, maybe thousands of nodes with
no centralized administrative control (as you would
need with decnet) the problem does indeed become a
trade off of don't do it at all or do the best you
can and get the bugs out over time. The extended
UUCP link networks are indeed a major problem,
address authentication is nearly impossible unless
you had the entire network topology in your machine
(a topology that seems to change every few minutes.)
You are right, it should be fixed (that's easy to say.)
However, if given the choice between no connectivity
until it is perfect and most connectivity and some
bugs I'll take the latter any day, even with some serious
routing bugs.
I think people that want wall-wall carpeted condos should
stay away from the frontiers...it's not as safe out there.
No one forces you do they?
-Barry Shein, Boston University
Gee, I hope this makes it but i DID save a copy via ~e
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list