summary of replies to my ultrix query..
Ozan Yigit
oz at yetti.UUCP
Mon Apr 29 10:26:10 AEST 1985
Due to the large number of requests for a copy of responses I
received on ultrix, I feel that it is worthwhile posting a summary.
o ULTRIX is bug-compatible with 4.2BSD (:-E]).
o DEC phone support for ULTRIX and ULTRIX application center
is very good.
o Error logging is much improved, so that DEC CE can actually
make sense out them without having to call BERKELEY.
o System installation is Q/A driven.
o According to some, ULTRIX is slow. (I personally do not
believe this. I actually saw a benchmark comparison of
ultrix vs 4.2 on same configuration. ULTRIX rated 15-20%
faster. I will try to find the source of this bencmark amongst
my great heap of journals..)
o It is best to get ULTRIX on source level, for maximum sanity.
o It appears that DEC ultrix group, with their infinite whizdom,
removed the fork() call. I am not yet sure of the significance
of this.
o Ultrix includes a MODULA-2 compiler. It is also rumored to have
DECNET support.
According to my knowledge, ULTRIX 1.1 is not yet released. It may be
worth while to wait and review this all over again.
Oz (wizard of something or another, no doubt..)
Electric: [decvax | ihnp4 | allegra | linus]!utzoo!yetti!oz
Bitnet: oz at yuleo
oz at yuyetti
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list