smart compilers
Chuck McManis
cem at intelca.UUCP
Sat Jan 5 06:23:18 AEST 1985
Again on the subject of "smart" compilers, specifically FORTRAN-IV on a DEC
2060XE running TOPS-20. The following code segment is approximate but the
situation was the same.
CALL FOO(X,0.,Z)
...
X2 = 0.
WRITE(5,10) X2
10 FORMAT(1X,F10.2)
END
SUBROUTINE FOO(X,Y,Z)
...
Y=1.0
RETURN
END
Where the compiler optimized all constant references to 0.0 to a memory
location containing 0.0 and the subroutine changed that value to 1.0. All
further references to 0 produced the value 1. Not to swift. (I know it is
poor style, and have since stopped using constants in subroutine calls.)
--Chuck
--
- - - D I S C L A I M E R - - -
{ihnp4,fortune}!dual\ All opinions expressed herein are my
{qantel,idi}-> !intelca!cem own and not those of my employer, my
{ucbvax,hao}!hplabs/ friends, or my avocado plant. :-}
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list