unix & at&t
John Woods
john at x.UUCP
Wed Jan 30 05:27:32 AEST 1985
[ Carelessly setting good sense and taste aside, he joins the fray: ]
As a hacker who wouldn't be happy with any particular distributed UNIX(tm)
binary, I am personally miffed that AT&T has no provision for me. Tough.
However, given the volume (what is the volume of a bit?) of ``discussion''
[sic] on this topic, it seems that there are at least 100 or so people who
are in a similar position. How about: each person chips in $500 or so to
add up to the purchase of a single source license and individual binary
licenses. The assembly of hackers then goes frenzied on the source machine
in a weekend orgy of creeping featurism, and everyone comes away with what
they want (possibly to return to the trough later).
I do not propose this seriously. I merely wish to point out that there may
be alternatives to the choice of $40K or "5 fingers".
Just because a "business" license is bought need not imply (I think) that
there is a profit-making business owning it.
Any obvious holes in this? Or am I making too much sense?
--------
Standard Disclaimer: no sane human being or company believes the above
nonsense. Especially me or mine.
--
John Woods, Charles River Data Systems, Framingham MA, (617) 626-1101
...!decvax!frog!john, ...!mit-eddie!jfw, jfw%mit-ccc at MIT-XX.ARPA
Sorry, I don't feel deep right now.
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list