Bourne shell modifications, past and future (long)

[Daniel R. Levy]

In article <10 at druri.UUCP>, clive at druri.UUCP (StewardCN) writes:
>Out of curiosity, just why don't you want to put in command aliasing?
>It's one of the most useful features in csh and ksh, I think.
>Clive

Maybe it's because the Bourne shell now supports shell functions?
-- 
 -------------------------------    Disclaimer:  The views contained herein are
|       dan levy | yvel nad      |  my own and are not at all those of my em-
|         an engihacker @        |  ployer or the administrator of any computer
| at&t computer systems division |  upon which I may hack.
|        skokie, illinois        |
 --------------------------------   Path: ..!ihnp4!ttrdc!levy