4.1 BSD mkfs(8) for an RA81?
eichelbe at nadc.ARPA
eichelbe at nadc.ARPA
Tue Nov 5 00:49:20 AEST 1985
In the near future we will be installing 3 DEC RA81 disk drives and
a UDA50 controller onto our VAX 11/780, which is running 4.1 (NOTE: that's 4.1)
BSD UNIX. We do not have anything like the newfs utility on 4.2 BSD. We are
stuck using the 4.1 BSD utility mkfs(8). The call to this utility is of the
form: /etc/mkfs special size [m n]
(at least how we use it). The man page for mkfs(8) says that the 'special'
parameter is the file partition (e.g., /dev/rhp2g) and the 'size' parameter is
the size of the file system in kilobytes. No problem so far. Now, although
the manual page seems to specify the 'm' and 'n' parameters as optional, we
have always supplied them as the manual page says 'm' should always be 3 and 'n'
should be as given in the following table:
RM03 80
RM05 304
RM80 217
RP06 209
RP07 800
SI/CDC 9766 304
RK07 33
EMULEX/AMPEX 300M 304
EMULEX/FUJITSU 160M 160
The manual page calls the 'm n' pair the interleave factor. What does this
mean? Since there was an 'n' for the SI/CDC 9766 drives we have, there was
no problem. But there is no entry for an RA81. My questions are:
(1) Is it OK to leave off 'm' and 'n', and will the mkfs(8) utility do the
'right thing' for me? For an SI/CDC 9766? FOR AN RA81???!!!
(2) If I want to specify 'm' and 'n' for the RA81, what should the values be?
Again, let me stress that I am under 4.1 BSD UNIX, and I have no newfs
utility.
(3) Although this is the least important question, how do you figure out
'm' and 'n', given a brand X drive with a brand Y controller for it?
(Actually, this may be the most important question in the long run.)
Thanks.
Jon Eichelberger
eichelbe at NADC.ARPA
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list