UUCP Protocol Request Status Summary
Tanner Andrews
tanner at ki4pv.UUCP
Wed Nov 13 09:24:09 AEST 1985
Summary of replies, and status:
(1) those who snet "me-too" messages will be getting a preliminary
draft of the information fairly soon. i need to wait to see
if i get anything else that clears up the matter.
(2) those wondering why i would want to deal with it: if i can't
get something of that nature up so i have a tolerable communication
with this pfing IBM-alike before long, I'll go out of my tree. I
am currently using a means of fle transfer that is so inconvenient
and human-attention-intensive that i think a uucp implementation
would pay for itself in not too much time. I might even replace
the implementation on this system with one that was a little more
tolerant of phone-dialing ideosyncracies.
(3) those warning of bell lawsuit if sources swiped: i'll be
careful. i have no access to the sources here, so it should
be pretty clear that i haven't swiped any trade secrets from
their sources. if i do write a prog that talks uucp,
i'll be careful with it and make sure that it stays out of the
trade-secret arena. i imagine that a little caution here now will
pay off later.
--
<std dsclm, copies upon request> Tanner Andrews, KI4PV
uucp: ...!decvax!ucf-cs!ki4pv!tanner
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list