Another reason why - really /tmp
Chris Torek
chris at umcp-cs.UUCP
Tue Oct 8 19:59:00 AEST 1985
> fsck never misses a lost+found directory, and you probably wouldn't
> care to recover any lost files in /tmp anyway.
Not so! Not, at least, in 4.2BSD. In particular, if `fsck' wants
to reconnect a file, but there is no lost+found, it will abort a
`preen' style fsck rather than clearing the inode. And `ex'---and
thus vi---temporary files are stored in /tmp; but they are still
useful, after a crash, for recovering most if not all of your
editing sessions.
--
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 4251)
UUCP: seismo!umcp-cs!chris
CSNet: chris at umcp-cs ARPA: chris at mimsy.umd.edu
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list