BLITs vs. PCs vs normal terminals
Gary S. Moss SLCBR-VLD-V
moss at BRL.ARPA
Fri Apr 25 00:21:18 AEST 1986
Neville writes...
< In all the postings about how BLITs are the answer to the world's windowing
< problems, nobody has pointed out some of its definite shortcomings...
I think "definite" is a strong word here, assuming you mean Teletype 5620s.
< It has an all metal case, to the tune of almost 60 pounds.
Given that it is not a portable terminal, I would rather it be encased in metal.
There is too much plastic in this world already, think of it as armor, besides
the case itself probably only accounts for 5 lbs. or so.
< It has no automatic screen-turn-off, so you keep reaching for the
< intensity knob at the end of the day.
Please, please, don't adopt the idiocy of Tektronics and their automatic
screen dimming, I hate that. It is so annoying to be staring at a screen and
have it fade out on you, besides the intensity knob is right under the screen,
you don't have to reach for it.
< ... Turning it off loses downloaded software.
What would you expect? Do you want your program to run on a processor with no
power? Do you expect programs loaded in RAM to stay there without power? Try
powering down the host computer and see if it does any better.
< Just try to get good technical help from AT&T Teletype for them. i dare you.
< If hardware is your only problem, you *may* have a (slim) chance.
This is probably a justified criticism.
< Many features are documented incorrectly (try to get keyboard repeat without
< running under layers), and many of the more useful functions will
< only work under layers even they could provide needed functionality
< outside of layers.
I get keyboard repeat fine when not in layers mode, what other functions
are you talking about, besides the windows of course?
-moss
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list