Terminfo()--Ideas needed. System V

[Mark Horton]

In order to compare the difference between termcap and terminfo with
something we are all more familiar with, I'm paraphrasing Mr. Todd's
posting, substuting a different example.  Let's compare C (a compiled
language) with shell (an interpreted language) and observe that binary
versions of UNIX still have readable (and editable) shell scripts.

>While I won't dispute the claim that C is more expressive, I
>still find it to be a HUGE step backwards in design: there just isn't
>sufficient justification for making the active, working program a
>compiled binary file -- PARICULARLY when AT&T then doesn't include the
>sources to the C programs. As shipped, the description for
>the xyztool is noticibly broken. To fix it, I'll have to completely
>rewrite the entire thing, since the readable (modifyable) version isn't
>available.  The shell isn't as expressive, perhaps, but I can write and
>modify shell descriptions easily. C is a loser.  Let us
>hope that Berkeley continues to support the better organized design, and
>doesn't attempt to corrupt BSD UNIXs too badly in the name of
>compatability.