death of nargs(3)
Doug Gwyn
gwyn at brl-smoke.ARPA
Thu Apr 28 01:39:26 AEST 1988
It is perhaps also worth pointing out that nargs() didn't really return
the number of arguments, just the number of words on the stack used for
arguments. As C grew, this became less sensible.
I can easily enough imagine a reasonable implementation of C for which
requiring that something like nargs() work would force a slower function
call interface, which would be a poor trade-off.
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list