command line options

Stuart A. Werbner stu at linus.UUCP
Wed Apr 20 23:04:49 AEST 1988


In article <2478 at zyx.UUCP> aj at zyx.UUCP (Arndt Jonasson) writes:
>In article <524 at vsi.UUCP> sullivan at vsi.UUCP (Michael T Sullivan) writes:
>>In article <7634 at brl-smoke.ARPA>, gwyn at brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) writes:
>>> 
>>> You miss the point; -? already has the desired property; it does not
>>
>>But using -? only _has_ to say that -? is a bad option.  You are relying
>>on the fact that all programs have good usage messages.  Some just say
>>"Bad option" and die (none of mine do, of course :-).
>
>I don't have much of an opinion in this matter, so I'll provide some
>statistics instead. I tried calling all programs in /bin in a SysV.2
>compatible system with -? as the single argument, and found the
>following:
>
>characteristic			number of programs
>
>Print a usage line (or several)	36
>Ignore it completely, although
> they do take options		 5
>Just say "bad option" in one
> way or another			14
>Do something else		 6
>
>Don't count, since they don't
> take any options, and thus
> don't watch out for any	17
>
>The total winner in silliness is 'wc': it does give a usage message, but
>only after the user has entered end-of-file!
>
>-- 
>Arndt Jonasson, ZYX Sweden AB, Styrmansgatan 6, 114 54 Stockholm, Sweden
>email address:	 aj at zyx.SE	or	<backbone>!mcvax!enea!zyx!aj

No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!
No more articles on "command line options"!!


				PLEAEAEAEAEAEAEAEAEAESE?????????



More information about the Comp.unix.wizards mailing list