RFS vs. NFS
Doug Gwyn
gwyn at brl-smoke.ARPA
Sun Mar 27 21:30:18 AEST 1988
In article <10184 at ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> ekrell at hector (Eduardo Krell) writes:
>I thought the key difference was that RFS maintains true Unix
>semantics when the file is remote. NFS does not (locks, for
>instance).
In some implementations, at least, there is a separate "lock daemon"
process that receives locking/unlocking requests on a socket and
coordinates access to the files. I know, it's a kludge, but it ought
to be able to work right (somebody did report problems with theirs).
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list