RFS vs. NFS

Larry McVoy lm at arizona.edu
Tue Mar 29 11:38:10 AEST 1988


In article <10186 at ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> ekrell at hector (Eduardo Krell) writes:
>And AT&T is not trying to lock you into AT&T products by pushing RFS;
>there are a lot of non AT&T boxes running System V Release 3 and RFS.

Truth in advertising, please.  How about a list of those boxes?  Maybe 
people will see the light and start to take RFS seriously?
-- 

Larry McVoy	lm at arizona.edu or ...!{uwvax,sun}!arizona.edu!lm



More information about the Comp.unix.wizards mailing list