RFS vs. NFS
Larry McVoy
lm at arizona.edu
Tue Mar 29 11:38:10 AEST 1988
In article <10186 at ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> ekrell at hector (Eduardo Krell) writes:
>And AT&T is not trying to lock you into AT&T products by pushing RFS;
>there are a lot of non AT&T boxes running System V Release 3 and RFS.
Truth in advertising, please. How about a list of those boxes? Maybe
people will see the light and start to take RFS seriously?
--
Larry McVoy lm at arizona.edu or ...!{uwvax,sun}!arizona.edu!lm
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list