read(2)/write(2) errno for end of 9-track tapes
TranKV
kvt at drutx.ATT.COM
Fri Mar 25 09:31:33 AEST 1988
When read(2)/write(2) are used to access a physical device in raw mode
(9-track tape devices specifically), are there a standard errno's that
read(2)/write(2) returns to signify end of physical tapes? Or do they
vary among UNIX versions and tape drives? If they are indeed different,
what one can do in application programs to make them portable when
changing tape drives or machines?
To add more spices to the discussion, here are some interesting
phenomenon:
- Using our 3B5 with UNIX V 2.0, we got errno=5 for both end of
tape read(2) and write(2).
- Using our 3B2/600 with UNIX V 3.1 with 9-track tape drive hooked
up through SCSI, we got errno=28 for end of tape write(2) and
errno=0 for end of tape read(2).
- We wrote a small C program to write(2) 5120 bytes at a time
to a 9-track tape on the 3B5 (using raw mode) until we got to
the end of tape. Then we tried to read(2) the tape (5120 bytes
at a time) on the 3B2. To our surprise, 3B2 can read more than
the 3B5 wrote and the 3B2 cannot detect end of tape without
giving error warning. Reverse the read/write order, the 3B5
seems read less than what was put on tape by the 3B2.
So we're confused. And help is definitely needed.
Kim Tran
AT&T EUO
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list