Should ``csh'' be part of the System V distribution?

[Rich Salz]

The answers seem to narrow down to:
    1.  Ksh is best
    2.  Csh is a crock
    3.  Csh is friendlier, and looks kinda like C
    4.  I want to do "this" in the XXXsh, how do I do it?
    5.  Sh is portable
    6.  On my system we have ### users of XXXsh, and only # users of XXXsh

Can we stop cluttering the net, now?

BTW, I would be interested in hearing anyone address the question
that was REALLY asked (go read the Subject line...)
	/rich $alz
-- 
Please send comp.sources.unix-related mail to rsalz at uunet.uu.net.