Open Software Foundation

[Michael T Sullivan]

In article <754 at fig.bbn.com>, rsalz at bbn.com (Rich Salz) writes:
> Reading between the lines, I gather they're going to rewrite EVERYTHING so
> that it contains no ATT licensed code.  If they pull it off, many people
> will be very happy.  

Why will removing AT&T & Sun from the code and putting IBM, DEC, et al
in the code make so many people happy?  It'll make IBM, DEC et al happy--
that I can understand.  Just who is going to be happy that they're jumping
from the AT&T frying pan into the IBM fire?

-- 
Michael Sullivan		{uunet|attmail}!vsi!sullivan
				sullivan at vsi.com
HE V MTL			Anybody out there remember Max Webster?