more on Ultrix 2.0 / Emulex disk throughput
G.Pavlov
pavlov at hscfvax.harvard.edu
Tue Sep 13 10:46:52 AEST 1988
In article <3613 at phoenix.Princeton.EDU>, paul at phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Paul Lansky) writes:
> Concerning Emulex QD series Disk controller behaviour under Ultrix 2.0
> > In article <615 at hscfvax.harvard.edu>, pavlov at hscfvax.harvard.edu (G.Pavlov) writes:
> >
> > The problem appears to be that DEC decreased the timeout interval on disk
> > requests......
>
> Can anyone tell me where this timeout occurs? Is it in the uda driver?
> its stragegy, start, or interrupt routine? I have picked through the
> driver a bit and cannot see anything there that would cause this. The
> problem is severe, however.....
> Thank you. (Both Dec and Emulex seem very tightlipped about this.
I was careful to say that this what was relayed to me by Emulex. I do not
have source code. DEC was not helpful. Emulex was difficult to deal with
all around. The entire incident chewed up most of what we saved on purchas-
ing 3rd party controllers instead of KDA's. On the other hand, those con-
trollers let us use Fuji Beagles (M2333K's).
greg pavlov.
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list