echoing style - DOS,VMS vs. Unix (was: AT&T Joining OSF)
Daniel R. Levy
levy at ttrdc.UUCP
Sun Sep 4 07:32:46 AEST 1988
In article <8420 at smoke.ARPA>, gwyn at smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) writes:
< Streams started out as "stackable line disciplines". To replace a line
< discipline, one would pop the old one and push a new one. Thus, in
< theory streams is a generalization that replaces the old notion of line
< disciplines. However, for purposes of compatibility, the terminal
< handler streams module may still support the old method internally.
<
< One might think that each orthogonal terminal handler feature would be
< controlled by a separate streams module, but that's not how it has been
< implemented. So to change echo behavior you'd have to provide a whole
< alternative terminal handler module.
Or, what about implementing the "better" scheme yourself, and provide, not a
single monolithic replacement terminal handler, but a number of sub-handlers
each of which controls each orthogonal feature etc....
Might this, however, lead to potential performance problems?
--
|------------Dan Levy------------| THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED HEREIN ARE MINE ONLY
| Bell Labs Area 61 (R.I.P., TTY)| AND ARE NOT TO BE IMPUTED TO AT&T.
| Skokie, Illinois |
|-----Path: att!ttbcad!levy-----|
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list