echoing style - DOS,VMS vs. Unix (was: AT&T Joining OSF)

Daniel R. Levy levy at ttrdc.UUCP
Sun Sep 4 07:32:46 AEST 1988


In article <8420 at smoke.ARPA>, gwyn at smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) writes:
< Streams started out as "stackable line disciplines".  To replace a line
< discipline, one would pop the old one and push a new one.  Thus, in
< theory streams is a generalization that replaces the old notion of line
< disciplines.  However, for purposes of compatibility, the terminal
< handler streams module may still support the old method internally.
< 
< One might think that each orthogonal terminal handler feature would be
< controlled by a separate streams module, but that's not how it has been
< implemented.  So to change echo behavior you'd have to provide a whole
< alternative terminal handler module.

Or, what about implementing the "better" scheme yourself, and provide, not a
single monolithic replacement terminal handler, but a number of sub-handlers
each of which controls each orthogonal feature etc....

Might this, however, lead to potential performance problems?
-- 
|------------Dan Levy------------|  THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED HEREIN ARE MINE ONLY
| Bell Labs Area 61 (R.I.P., TTY)|  AND ARE NOT TO BE IMPUTED TO AT&T.
|        Skokie, Illinois        | 
|-----Path:  att!ttbcad!levy-----|



More information about the Comp.unix.wizards mailing list