Asynchronous I/O under UNIX
James Shankland
jas at postgres.uucp
Fri Dec 22 05:08:53 AEST 1989
In article <6679 at lynx.UUCP> m5 at lynx.uucp (Mike McNally) writes:
>peterson at crash.cts.com (John Peterson) writes:
>... in fact, if I had threads, I don't think I'd
>want or need a separate kernel-supported async I/O mechanism.
Yes! I strongly agree, and it sure is nice to hear someone else taking
this position. I consider asynchronous I/O a hack to compensate for the
absence of sufficiently lightweight processes. Of course, one person's
spartan elegance is another's semantic impoverishment, but I consider
it a cleaner, clearer programming model.
jas
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list