AT&T 630 terminal - software ??
Glen Overby
ncoverby at ndsuvax.UUCP
Sun Jan 15 15:14:42 AEST 1989
In article <9348 at smoke.BRL.MIL> gwyn at brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>) writes:
>In article <1003 at vsi.COM> friedl at vsi.COM (Stephen J. Friedl) writes:
>>Sorry, AT&T has mislead you. This is the pricing for the 630:
> Part Name: Comcode: Part Number: $Cost:
>1) Controller (640Kb) 501 001 671 553 750 AAA 920.00
>2) Monitor 501 001 697 53D 610 YAA 815.00
>3) 98-Key Keyboard 501 004 865 56K 420 ADA V2 108.00
>4) Mouse, 3-button,red 524 594 157 459 415 115.00
I find this price to be a bit above that of the common PC clone. So why
hasn't somebody written a a terminal emulator for such a machine which
operates somewhat like the BLIT? Even a PC should at least be able to
display multiple windows without crawling too badly, and if you put a
fancier video adapter (such as EGA or VGA) on the machine, you can have more
than 25 lines (this, of course, does bring the price of the PC closer to
that of the Real Thing).
Maybe it would be better if some relatively terminal-independent "windowed
terminal protocol" would be defined (I don't know how much of this already
exists with the Blit, and how much of it AT&T will give away). There are
obviously are places where machine independence is impossible, such as when
the user interface part of an editor is downloaded into the terminal, but
this could certainly be accomodated in the protocol.
I have seen a program called "uw" which runs on a Macintosh and provides
multiple-window access. It's pretty Macintosh-specific but I still thought
it as interesting.
When your host computer goes down, you can still play games on the PC (or
some other marginally productive activity)
The coffee cup holder would, of course, be an "optional feature" :-)
Glen Overby ncoverby at plains.nodak.edu
uunet!ndsuvax!ncoverby ncoverby at ndsuvax (Bitnet)
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list