GNU-tar vs dump(1)

[Alan Judge]

In article <1966 at netmbx.UUCP> felix at netmbx.UUCP (Felix Gaehtgens) writes:
>everybody's talking about GNU-tar and i'm convinced! it's (from what i've
>read) much better than tar, dump, restore, cpio, etc.
>
>but how about posting it in comp.sources.unix, comp.sources.misc or so? then
>we all can have a copy to evaluate.
I agree, perhaps comp.sources.misc would be better given the current lead time
on comp.sources.unix.
--
Alan Judge, Dept. of Maths., Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
ajudge at maths.tcd.ie		Stupid Mailers: ...!uunet!maths.tcd.ie!ajudge