csh problem involving nested ifs?
Root Boy Jim
rbj at dsys.ncsl.nist.gov
Fri Jul 14 06:31:16 AEST 1989
? From: Peter da Silva <peter at ficc.uu.net>
? Basically, it is undesirable to use the 'C' shell for any complicated
? scripts... or any scripts at all other than .cshrc and .login.
I disagree. CSH is much more natural to use than SH. The constructs are
more natural. In csh, I don't have to resort to `expr' and `test'
because these are builtin. The only things I see SH is good for are:
1) portability - sh exists everywhere
2) trivial scripts - starts faster
3) complex file redirection - but how often do you do 3> anyway?
4) shell fns - neat
5) piping to `for' and `while' - but how often?
Of course, newer SH's and KSH help quite a bit.
? Peter da Silva, Xenix Support, Ferranti International Controls Corporation.
? Business: peter at ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180. | Th-th-th-that's all folks...
? Personal: peter at sugar.hackercorp.com. `-_-' | -- Mel Blanc
? Quote: Have you hugged your wolf today? 'U` | May 30 1908 - Jul 10 1989
Root Boy Jim
Have GNU, Will Travel.
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list