rsh & tar - really why post followups?

[John M. Sellens]

In article <19836 at adm.BRL.MIL> drears at pica.army.mil (Dennis G. Rears (FSAC)) writes:
> [A question about rsh giving problems, where it is obvious to any wizard
> that the problem is his .cshrc on the remote machine]

I was surprised to see a whole bunch of followups to this question all
saying (except the wrong ones of course) essentially "don't run stty
from .cshrc for non-interactive shells".

My question is: why did so many wizards followup this easy question
in comp.unix.wizards instead of sending mail to the original poster,
and suggesting that he summarize the answer to the group?

Are we not wizards?