What kind of things would you wnat in the GNU OS
Tim Olson
tim at crackle.amd.com
Mon Jun 5 07:11:30 AEST 1989
In article <6275 at cs.Buffalo.EDU> ugkamins at sunybcs.UUCP (Dr. Chandra) writes:
| Rex_E._Robards.DlosLV at xerox.com wrote:
| =>Three things that should not be in an efficient OS:
| => 1) virtual memory
| => 2) symbolic links
| => 3) long file names (BSD directories)
|
| VM: nice, but certainly not efficient. Point well taken.
Efficient in what sense? VM makes more efficient use of "relatively
scarce" main memory -- processes only need to keep their working sets in
memory instead of their entire image. This potentially allows more
processes to run than would normally fit in main memory.
| symlinks: somewhat stupid in the first place, to me. There are
| already normal links. About the only advantage I can see is that
| when copying files, links duplicate files whereas symlinks can be
| "detected" and remade on the destination device/directory. Not sure
| how they impact on EFFICIENCY though.
Try linking to a file on another file system without symlinks!
-- Tim Olson
Advanced Micro Devices
(tim at amd.com)
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list