Cray I/O (was: Re: What kinds of things)
Steve Lamont
spl at mcnc.org
Sat Jun 3 10:54:19 AEST 1989
In article <873 at mtxinu.UUCP> shore at mtxinu.com (Melinda Shore) writes:
>several hundred users running huge jobs. Remember also that these are
>word-oriented machines, and no instruction is smaller than 1 word (8
>bytes). Swapping performance used to be pretty awful too; I hope
>that's been fixed.
One minor correction and then we can probably either move this topic
elsewhere or give it a rest. The instructions are variable length and
may be either one or two "parcels" in length. A parcel is 16 bits long
and, obviously, there are 4 parcels per Cray word. Parcels may span
word boundaries.
As far as swap performance goes, I'll have to leave that to the
performance junkies. I like my Cray time stand alone, so I don't have
to worry about all those pesky users. I don't get it that way... but I
do like it that way... :-)
Your other comments about hyperchannel (or Ultrabus) are apt. These
devices like large blocks of data. Small packets can be murder,
particularly if they have to compete with, say, a mass storage subsystem
of any sort, also on the hyperchannel. However, the productivity
enhancement of doing editing (touch up kind -- the serious text editing
belongs on a workstation) is worth it.
--
spl
Steve Lamont, sciViGuy EMail: spl at ncsc.org
North Carolina Supercomputing Center Phone: (919) 248-1120
Box 12732/RTP, NC 27709
More information about the Comp.unix.wizards
mailing list